Boo Hoo, pass Heart a tissue

I've tried to find the link that these comments are posted to at HEARTS, but I see that she has deleted it. Things got a bit tense in the comment section when a dyke poster named Satsuma was burning up the keyboard with ranting screeds about heterosexual woman and how stupid they are and how much she hates children etc. Here's a snippet from Satsuma, that charmer:

"I’ve watched women play step and fetch-it with men since I was very young. It makes me sick oftentimes to watch straight women when men come into the room. I can’t take it, and I try to stay in single gender events as much as possible — either all men or all women. I can’t bear to see the hee hee giggle giggle shuffle shuffle yes massah man you’s the king sort of behavior that straight women turn on all the time.
If only they could see this on You Tube. Does it ever end?
Oy vey… cults, having a million babies, poverty, conformity, female false debility…. can’t take it I tell you, I just can’t take it!"

When some het woman took offense to this nonsense, Heart defended Satsuma and told everyone to listen and learn even though the majority of her posts were some of the most misogynistic writings I have ever seen on her blog. A number of women, regular readers of Heart's and probably big contributors to her little festival "vacations" repeatedly asked Heart to shut Satsuma up and Heart said NO then apparently spread the word that some het women were trying to silence a dyke on her blog. Things came to a head with these last two comments"

Comment on Men, Boys, Sons — Something I Wrote to Someone I Love by SisBy Sis
I thought I was the only het woman posting in reponse to Satsuma. Oh Kitty too. So now Heart you’ve got it all over the blogosphere that het women are attacking a poor dyke here. Fuck you.

Comment on Men, Boys, Sons — Something I Wrote to Someone I Love by womensspace
By womensspace
All right, that’s it. Sis, that is way over the top.
I’m closing the thread to further comments. I am going to have a nice cry. And then decide how I will proceed from here.
Since when have I ever deserved that, Sis? When?

Oh dear, Heart is off having a nice cry about allowing a stranger to verbally abuse a bunch of her regular readers...WOMMIN NO LESS!

I'm shocked!

Ok, whatever!!

Comment found at Heart's:

Comment on Megan Williams by Jamaal
By Jamaal
MESSAGE TO ALL (BROTHERS AND SISTERS) ITS TIME 2 STAND THE FUCK UP DO WHAT WE HAVE TO DO BECAUSE THOSE MOTHER-FUCKING PALE ASS, DEVIL WORSHIPPING, DRUG JUNKIES, CEREAL KILLING, STINKING BODY, DOG LICKING, HUNKY ACTING CRACKERS ( SOME/MAJORITY WHITE FOLKS) ARE NOT LOOKING TO HELP US BEACUSE THEY DONT GIVE A SHIT, SO YOU KNOW WHAT FUCK THEM!!!!!!! (NOT ALL) AND I HOPE ONE OF THEM RACIST KIDS GETS IT x2!!!

Smelly Socks

Heart (Cheryl Seelhoff) uses sockpuppets to respond on web forum then slips up and gets caught. LMAO. I guess she's practicing being dishonest again so that she fits in with all the other presidential candidates. (she's got the trolling for money thing down pat by now)

Way to go, Heart!

Get out of her sandbox!

OH....MYGOD. This feminist, (Ginmar), is as humorless as they come. Check out the comment section on this particular post. Here's a sample of what you'll get if you don't agree with her take on things:

"Your comments are ignorant...because they are. You're looking at the case from an ignorant perspective that denies the disparate treatment of whites and blacks, denies that there's such a disparity, and then whines that you're not ignorant for sounding like a redneck.

I don't disregard your opinion because it's different. I disregard becuase you're wrong and you can't read. What did I tell you about 'stifling dissent'? That's bullshit and trolling. You won't get another warning. "

Overreact much???

I think we all just need to gather up our toys and leave her alone in her sandbox. We'll be safer that way and not have to endure her verbal abuse masquerading as her being a superior authority on all issues.

Dear Miss Manners,

For your reading pleasure, I present...How not to extend an invitation.

In a nutshell, rude, privileged white woman emails a woc (#1) asking her to forward an email to another woc (#2). The rude, privileged woman is from Feministe and she is inquiring whether the woc (#2) will be a guest blogger. WOC (#2) takes exception to the fact that rude, privileged white woman couldn't take the time to find out her email address and instead asks woc (#1) to forward the email to her. It's all played out in emails which are printed for everyone's embarrassment and enjoyment.

PS. Sometimes, an invitation is just an invitation and nothing more, so why get all worked up over nothing?

Sheesh.

Selective Compassion

Boo hoo. Heart won't give press time to the Jena 6 until something is done about the Lesbian 7!

Here's what you have to do, Heart, in case you weren't paying attention. Write about the Lesbian 7 every single day. Create graphics and post them in your blogs. Keep writing about them over and over again and then what will happen is that some popular, white, privileged menz will get wind of the story 6 months late and write about it like it's brand new news and finally someone will pay attention to the story. It's that simple.

Then you can go back to whining about the menz again and how much you hate them.

DUH!

A "Feminist" justifying her usage of non feminist labels

"Technically, I think a woman who supports the patriarchy, believes in the patriarchy and practices all the rules of the patriarchy can in fact be a bitch, whore, or a cunt because those labels with definitions of what they are, are in fact presented and used in the patriarchy’s world. Therefore if a woman is working outside of the patriarchy or attempting to deconstruct the patriarchy and is engaged with a woman who lives in the patriarchy she can used those labels (without a penalty for foul) when dealing with that patriarchal tool.

That language is a violation of feminist code; however, the interaction is not being conducted in a feminist realm (because one of the two is not a feminist), as in a feminist talking to a feminist. Of course it can be argued that ethically a feminist should not employ the language that feminists are against but when there is an absent of a interim language sometimes it is necessary to speak in the tongue of the beast that one is attempting to enlightened because that beast has not learned the new language yet (if ever).

Besides if they spent as much time and effort calling the menz out for using similar language then feminists would not have to work so darn hard."

-Kitty Glendowerhttp://egarooo.blogspot.com/

also known as chasingmoska


In other words, if Kitty feels like calling you a cunt, bitch or whore, she'll pull out her "you're a patriarchal tool" card and say you deserve it. She can't be held responsible because she's a "feminist" dealing with a "patriarchal tool." Of course, Kitty gets to be in control and decide which side you're on because that way, Kitty can never be wrong or held responsible for her abusive language. How convenient. FOR KITTY.

Isn't she special?

Nope, just a mean old hypocrite.